World Wide Web from Google Incident Freedom of Information distance from the

251feg2f76y

Recently, the United States on the United States wishes to withdraw from Google's happened in China dispute. Sino-US version is 2, there are various differences, but also to follow humans share many common code of conduct. Whether Google is to take leave or stay, should be good as a whole, should not be confused on bad terms. handbags United States claims that men are created equal, should have equal access to information. However, in the United States did not unrestricted freedom of information, because it must proceed from a security are not allowed the free dissemination of certain information, including the accused could endanger U.S. national security, territorial integrity, religious harmony, etc., as well as may be detrimental the adverse physical and mental health information and other young people. leather handbags U.S. restrictions on freedom of information dissemination examples abound. The last century, the fifties and sixties, the U.S. president four consecutive issues in Vietnam, to deceive the public, especially the Johnson against the presidential campaign promises, blocking the battlefield news, which will set fire to the entire Indo-China war. The American president would deliberately conceal this major conditions resulting in a serious crisis situation the country has caused the U.S. Department of Defense General Staff, Daniel? 埃尔斯博格 great ideas, he then in 1971 to "The New York Times" and the "Washington Post" reveal the truth, causing a strong public dissatisfaction with the government. Matter called the "Pentagon Papers" incident, which promoted the seventies the American people, anti-war movement. Guccl Bag Sanshiernian, the Bush administration to launch military action against Iraq, using an error message that decision-making, to mislead the public's support. The United States in 2003, toppling Saddam launched the war in Iraq does not have a participation in the "911" incident, intelligence, two do not have the time Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction intelligence, the three do not have the UN Security Council authorization to use force to overthrow a sovereign still governments, and caused 110,000 deaths in Iraq so far, serious violations of international law. Senator Clinton, then the White House had been misled by the use of force against Iraq cast a vote, which is obviously affected by her subsequent presidential dreams. Today, the U.S. secretary of state should be well aware of this. do not have to deny freedom of information is the kinds of ideals, but the United States often hypocritical. For a long time, the U.S. government on major issues not only in the limited public information, but also let the public be misled into believing false lines. This is damaging U.S. national interests, and make it "information freedom" seems hypocritical preaching. Today, the United States caused serious damage to Iraq, the U.S. military stayed in that did not go, the Obama campaign have proposed withdrawal from Iraq. But even if the U.S. withdrawal, it would not apologize to the Iraqi government and people will not be a result of the illegal war in Iraq to make compensation for losses, it will not prosecute the instigators of war. America's outrageous injustice is difficult to convince the world its "freedom of information," how much good faith. access to the Internet era, the United States asked other countries to implement the one hand, freedom of information online, eliminating network "firewall" in order to facilitate smooth flow of American values; the other hand, run up their own network "firewall\right has been harmful information, such as not allowed to "al-Jazeera" television on landing. Especially the "911" incident, the United States war on terrorism grounds, the Legislative listening public communication, closely monitored by public opinion, causing the United States civil rights setback. U.S. intelligence agencies more than 10 countries annual budget of tens of billions of dollars, a considerable portion of funding that is used to detect foreign governments and a variety of communications between the people at home and abroad. U.S. legislative restrictions on certain information flows, such as refused to terrorism, nuclear proliferation, religious extremism, national separatism and the like freedom of information dissemination, the scope is still understandable. Pulp bad information to classify it, using the law to protect young people deserve our respect. But the United States should not be in its Manifest, makes Hun Hun. Its own can not do, have to force other countries to do. United States share a common criteria, all claim to respect human rights. But we do not understand why the U.S. government and some Americans, often consisting of Chinese Americans and unequal treatment in a number of Americans think they should be distinguished. For example, a century ago, tens of thousands of Americans, missionary to China, the Chinese people actually want to enlightenment. For another example, the United States to help China's recovery of Taiwan, but now to help Taiwan and mainland China military confrontation, which in turn reflects the Sino-US equity, and how the two peoples in the issue of safeguarding national unity have equal rights? facts show that the United States to undermine China's core interests, so there is some sort of confrontational Sino-US relations. Thus, to oppose and prevent damage to the United States and some other countries I have high interest, namely, our national security and social stability is China's largest national interests. Let us hope that freedom of information, but in some countries a long time and continues to endanger China's national interests, national security, China with the United States and all other countries, it is with regret that at this stage still can not fully achieve freedom of information, not even the unconditional freedom of information should be implemented, or is irresponsible to their own country. in operation, the security of our country must also proceed from the state are not allowed the free dissemination of harmful information. The so-called harmful to our country, but also those which may endanger national security, territorial integrity, religious harmony, etc., as well as the adverse mental and physical health may be detrimental to young people information. We do this is to safeguard the country's fundamental interests. This is not because the United States and other countries to do so we have the power to do so. As the fundamental interests of the nation-state, and we have such a power in itself, without other countries tell us whether this is correct and should be how to do. our review of the content on the Internet, is to safeguard the national interest is all about. This is not because Google came before we do so, it will not because of Google to go and change. Google, we welcome. It is to go, we bid farewell, without the need to expose this company came in and out of the subtleties, nor necessary to do one on the U.S. political and business re-issued the status quo. What we need to thank Google for several years to accept my terms to cooperate with us, and expressed regret that it says to go. Of course, we should be Google, and all foreign enterprises in China to improve the business environment, but expressed regret for Google: China will not be for it to accommodate national laws, to provide it with extra-territorial, even if it is Google or any other song ! Any foreign enterprises in China have to accept the local law, just as any US-funded enterprises must abide by U.S. law. China did not formulate a special law aimed at Google, Google does not intentionally wronged. Google to enter China before, the response to the legal environment in China has done its research. It is running to China a few years later Tugan discomfort, but added astonishing. United States government does double standards on freedom of information, Google seems to work ethic than its government. Google does not find the U.S. government to change its double standards, but it came to China complained that China's laws, rather than thanked China for its welcome, can not help but even more surprising. After all, China does not beg for Google in China. way others have behaved, do not impose on others. As a summary, the authors once again to remind the United States not to impose its own can not do other countries. Freedom of information is not a reality in the nation-state continue to exist and that there is competition, it left the ideal is not small distance. To shorten the distance, the United States should not continue to pursue a threat to China's policies and correct their own practice. (Professor Shen Dingli of Fudan University) > Related Reading: Western criticism Gates statement Google said it is China's accomplices event Xinhua: Google China became a political issue out of how the China Youth Daily: Google played out a farce dingy Ministry of Foreign Affairs to respond to exit Google Event: foreign invested enterprises should abide by Chinese laws and regulations, Google announced that the Chinese business returned to normal operation


Europeisveryhealthyflying               www.handbags-shops.com